Government must axe ‘dangerous’ housing plans
The NRLA has added its voice to calls opposing plans to exempt landlords who are housing asylum seekers from meeting vital housing safety standards.
It has signed a joint letter to Michael Gove and Suella Braverman saying it is wrong that the lives of vulnerable people should be put at risk in this way – with fears that those awaiting news of their asylum claim could be packed into dangerous, overcrowded homes.
The Government plans to remove HMO licensing requirements for private sector properties that are used by the Home Office to house asylum seekers, saying the department will carry out its own inspections.
However the NRLA and other signatories, including the Chartered Institute of Housing, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, Crisis and Shelter, believe plans to remove the requirements is completely unnecessary and potentially dangerous.
In the letter, the group casts doubt on the Home Office’s ability to carry out sufficient and comprehensive inspections.
It has particular concerns over potentially dangerous overcrowding and lax enforcement of gas and electrical safety standards which could pose a severe fire risk.
The letter says: “As well as safety issues, the potential for increased use of substandard buildings could affect the health and wellbeing of people seeking sanctuary.
“Limited [or no] controls over room-sharing may well lead to conflicts between occupants, and to safeguarding dangers. Occupants could be condemned to near cell-like conditions in rooms which could have no windows.”
NRLA Chief Executive Ben Beadle said: “We know there is a backlog of asylum claims and the Government faces challenges when it comes to accommodating those waiting to hear if their claim has been successful.
“However proposals to remove safety standards as a way of tackling these challenges is simply not acceptable.
“We cannot support a move that would potentially endanger lives or put safety and wellbeing at risk.
“The move seems completely at odds with the Government’s broader efforts to improve building safety across the board and we hope, in the face of such widespread opposition, Ministers will rethink these plans.”
